On Reviving the Arts

Rob Johnson, President of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, is not your average economist. He’s got heart and soul, or if you’ll have it, the blues! With his deep connection to the arts and humanities, Rob leads the new economic thinking not just with a sharp mind, but also with sensibility.

This article is part of an ongoing series in which Rob shares his life experiences, and biggest lessons learned. If you’re an aspiring expert in economics or a related field, this is for you. It might mitigate the depth and duration of your mid-life crisisEarlier articles in this series can be found here.


9 – On Reviving the Arts

When I left the hedge fund industry and started working in music, I walked into a different world.  

Right after acquiring a label, I got together with one of the artists in Chicago. I said, hey there’s no proper contract here, let’s set this up. So he said “well listen to me play this set and come to the stage and we’ll talk.” So I came up with a contract; it basically said he’d get a check for three thousand dollars advance, and then royalties quarterly. And he goes “you see that A.T.M? I will play this next set, and you will pull out three hundred dollars. You don’t have to be doing this in his contract, because nobody ever pays that stuff anyway.” That was a surprise; in the hedge fund industry, I used to trade five hundred million dollars based on word, and now this!  

The thing I loved most, by far, was being a producer in the studio–because of the emotional context. When people play music, they can be very vibrant, free and creative. But when they are recording music, that doesn’t always come out. Often there is a dread to be putting down something that people can hear for all time. There’s a fear around that. So as a producer, the question is how do you get past that? How do you unleash the genius that’s within them? I wanted to help them realize that which they’d be most proud of. But I had to get them into the right state of mind. They had to feel that there was no downside to really go for it. That’s hard to do, but I found creative ways. 

With this one artist, while we were in the studio, his ex-wife called him and he got in a fight. He was really pissed and he just kept on talking to her. I was getting annoyed because I was paying $400/hour for the studio while he was fighting. But he had a song called “I Gave You What You Wanted, Too Damn Bad You Didn’t Like What You Got” which was about them splitting up. So I said “I think we gotta try I Gave You What You Wanted” tonight, and everybody started grinning. When he took the mic it was like a leopard came out; he just crushed it. 

Other times, we’d be in a juke joint, doing a performance and I’d be keeping an eye out for songs to be recorded live. I knew if the band leader had a certain fondness for a lady in the audience. So sometimes,  rather than going up and asking him if he would play a certain song, I’d write it on a piece of paper and give it to her, so she could ask him to do it. That worked! He played with so much more passion because it wasn’t me, the producer, coercing him. It was the people he wanted to energize who came with the request.  

So in that environment, the currency of motivation was different than logic. Music is an expression of the spirit; it’s not quite as literal as math and models and sense of proportion and all those other things. I think both are valuable. Your question is just in what place do you employ which methods to get the results you’re looking for.  

Later on, music also opened a door to documentary film. It started because PBS wanted to make a series on the Blues. Martin Scorsese was involved and he hired a man named Alex Gibney to run with it. At that point, Bob Dylan’s manager, Jeff Rosen, who is a good friend of mine, told me about the series because I had a number of blues artists that were active that could be featured. So, Jeff made sure Alex and I got together. 

Not only did we end up working together for the series, but over time we really developed a kinship. I ended up moving my offices in with his offices and started working on documentary film. About this time was the Iraq War and the notion of financial issues. He was making a movie called Enron The Smartest Guys in the Room based on a very well known book. I could advise him because I knew some of the stories about how Enron was discovered; one of the members of INET’s Global Partners Council was one of the short sellers who’d seen it coming.  

Then, Alex and I got interested in this torture film. The journalist Bill Moyers used to work with Alex’s father, and I knew Bill very well. There was this group called the Democracy Alliance and Bill and I had talked about torture. Alex’s father had been an interrogator not using torture under General Douglas MacArthur after the Japanese were apprehended, so he was very interested. I went out, put some money in, got some money from other people, and we built a film called Taxi to the Dark Side. It won the Oscar for best feature documentary for 2007! It was a very grim film, obviously. We used to tease each other and say, you know, you come home, you say to your wife, “hey, honey, let’s get some sushi, go to the torture movie!” 

I learned a lot about film editing, camera work, and story development from Alex Gibney and his team; it was great. But in the meantime, the global economy was headed for a cliff… 


Earlier articles in this series can be found here.

Subscribe to receive the next article directly to your inbox! And in the meantime, take a look at Rob’s podcast Economics and Beyond, available wherever you get your podcasts.

Let’s honor YSI’s outgoing coordinators!

We are so grateful to YSI’s outgoing coordinators! They were the first ever cohort, and they made the community into what it is today. Let’s acknowledge their invaluable contributions and celebrate their next moves!

We are so grateful to YSI’s outgoing coordinators! They were the first ever cohort, and they made the community into what it is today. Let’s acknowledge their invaluable contributions and celebrate their next moves! Take a look at their warmest memories, best advice, and what they’re up to now. Please join us in thanking them, and keep an eye out for them in the future! They might be a young mentor soon. Written by Mariana Campos Pastrana


Africa


Richard Itaman  | For Richard Itaman, YSI’s ongoing commitment to highlighting African scholars remains an important pillar of our community. Attending the Decolonizing Economics conference in South Africa and the  Economic Transformation and History of Economic Thought conference in Nigeria made him proud as he witnessed the brilliance of young African scholars being showcased at both events. We’re just as proud of Richard!


Ushehwedu Kufakurinani | Let’s say thanks to Ushe! The Zimbabwean scholar lists the Africa Convening hosted in his city, Harare, as one of his favorite memories as coordinator for the Africa working group. His advice to new members, “your response is key to your destiny. Participation is key to reaping maximum benefits.” We appreciate all the love Ushe has poured into our community.


Tinashe Nyamunda | For Tinahse, helping other young scholars has been a big motivation for his work. As coordinator, Tinashe has helped grow YSI’s membership in Africa significantly. If he had one piece of advice for new members, it’s to remember how your work will help others in theirs. We wish Tinashe good luck in all that’s ahead!


Alden Young | As coordinator, Alden organized multiple events in Africa, including the continent’s first big YSI conference at the University of the Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Alden has just been appointed as a Senior Assistant Professor at UCLA in a joint appointment between the African American Studies Department and the International Development Studies department. The latter was inspired by his work with YSI! We are so happy for Alden.


Behavior and Society


Malte Dold | The ability to exchange ideas with other young scholars around the world opened Malte’s eyes to the many ways in which economic research can be conducted and was liberating for him as he gained new creative tools to perform his research. Malte believes that YSI has the power to change how economics is taught. The next step in his journey is to join the Economics department at Pomona College as an Assistant Professor. Congrats Malte!


Gerçek Çiçek | Gerçek is the true embodiment of YSI’s interdisciplinary spirit. She completed her Ph.D. in Economics at Istanbul Technical University while simultaneously doing a second master’s in Neuroscience. Her goal is to use Cognitive Neuroscience to redefine Microeconomics decision-making models so that they reflect real people and real life. We wish Gerçek nothing but the best!


Complexity Economics


Mary Kaltenberg | Mary’s biggest piece of advice for YSI newbies is to get involved in projects you are passionate about so that you can learn from scholars at all stages of their research and expand your global network. Mary will soon be starting as Assistant Professor at Pace University. Good luck, Mary, your students will be lucky to have you!


Danilo Spinola | Danilo’s biggest advice for new YSI’ers is to think of the community as a part of yourself, and of yourself as a part of the community. In YSI, there is no trade-off between the individual or the group. It’s simple – if the community thrives, the individual develops. Get involved and immersed in this organization and see where the magic takes you. We know Danilo will make magic happen! 


Johannes Tiemer | In 2012, Johannes joined YSI’s first-ever reading group on Alan Kirman’s “Complex Economics.” Together with two others, he ended up attending all the sessions, and the three became the coordinators for Complexity Economics; the first-ever YSI topical working group! Through his time at YSI, Johannes has enjoyed grappling with the big questions in society, for which there are no simple answers. His advice for new members is to remember that the work might be difficult at times, and that is ok. Now that’s a piece of good advice.


Nils Rochowicz | Nils has enjoyed seeing how YSI and its members have grown together. Members from way back are now professors, and able to mentor the newer young scholars coming in. It’s a beautiful thing to see people come in, find their way, and then grow to guide others.  Nils is now based at the University of Oxford. They’re lucky to have you, Nils!


Economic Development


Collin Constantine | “Stay hungry, stay foolish,” says Collin. This outgoing coordinator continues to push boundaries and paradigms and advises all newbies to YSI to do the same! His time with the Economic Development working group pushed his research agenda towards the direction of inequality and critical institutional economics. The next step in his journey sees him starting as a Lecturer with the Faculty of Economics at the University of Cambridge. We’re so proud!


Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven | The ability to meet people from all corners of the world with similar interests was one of the highlights for Ingrid in her time as coordinator. YSI almost became like a second degree for her because the debates she organized and participated in influenced her research and thinking a lot. Even though she may no longer be a coordinator, she continues to collaborate with fellow YSI members. We’re so grateful for that!


Jenny Tue Anh Nguyen | As coordinator for the Economic Development working group, Jenny’s interest took her to projects on energy policy, public services, World Bank loans, structural reforms, and economic growth, to name a few. She shaped YSI with unbounded energy, strengthening the community’s reach with the Asia Regional Convening in her native Vietnam! We are so grateful to Jenny, and thrilled for what she’ll do next.


Economics of Innovation


Besiana Balla | Besiana is one of the co-founders of the Economics of Innovation working group, which launched in 2014! Since then, she’s helped the group grow and flourish. Currently serving the innovative start-up world from Berlin, Besiana continues to advance the field of economics, not in the least by promoting diversity and representation in the field via D-Econ. We’re rooting for you, Besiana!


Olga Mikheeva | Olga’s interests lie in governance of innovation policies, financing thereof and financial bureaucracy; comparative financial history and financing of development; national political economy of finance. Currently a Research Fellow in Public Banking at the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, we wish Olga all the best!


Laurène Tran | Laurène is one of the founding members of the Economics of Innovation working group. She is now Executive Director of ACTIVE, a trade association that advocates for policies around broader access to cannabinoids. Laurene enjoys building communities and launching new ventures, which she certainly helped us with at YSI in her time as a coordinator. We are so thankful for all of her hard work!


Economic History


Peter Bent | Through his time in YSI, Peter Bent has built many great friendships with people from all over the world. Seeing all the work people put into organizing events, and seeing new connections and projects come out of that has been so inspiring, he says. Peter will soon be starting as an Assistant Professor of Economics at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. We’re so thrilled for that new chapter!


Marc C. Adam | Marc’s favorite thing in YSI? The bright young scholars with full hearts. Marc has experienced the community as a group of friendly and tolerant individuals who welcome new members as they are to learn and grow with YSI. We’re so thankful for all that Marc has done!


Laura de la Villa | Laura served as coordinator for the Economic History group, but holds diverse interests within economics, including financial history, sovereign debt, capital markets, political economy, and law and globalization. She is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the Paul Bairoch Institute for Economic History at the University of Geneva. We wish her all the best!


Finance, Law, and Economics


Aleksandar Stojanovic | Looking back on his time as coordinator, Sasa points out that “we’re all embedded in one mainstream or another that can lull our curiosities to sleep; YSI is the best antidote to that.” We can’t agree more and are grateful to Sasa for having shaped the FLE group with that approach.  He’s just begun teaching at NYU in Shanghai – congratulations!


Maria Cecilia del Barrio Arleo | When we asked Maria Cecilia what her favorite YSI memory was, she said she’d have to pick the unofficial YSI party at an Edinburgh pub. Members had seemingly endless conversations about their working groups while drinking cold beer. So what’s next? Maria Cecilia will be stepping into the 2020 European Central Bank graduate program this month. Amazing!


Financial Stability


Céline Tcheng | “I owe YSI my whole intellectual growth in Economics and Finance,” says Céline. When she was studying for her masters in economics, she explains, the content in her program left her underwhelmed and left her second-guessing her interest in the field; it was a crisis of faith. But joining YSI opened her eyes to a whole new world of economic thought and reconciled her with economics. We’re so glad we found you, Céline!


Miriam Oliveira | Miriam is grateful that YSI has connected her with an open community of scholars. The teaching of economics has a long way to go, but YSI is filling the gap for a whole generation of new thinkers. With a Ph.D. in Economics from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), and experience in financial stability, macroeconomics, and macroprudential policy, we can’t wait to see where she’ll go next! 


Gender and Economics


Erica Aloe | Recent PhD grad, Erica, feels proud to have been a part of YSI’s mission. She credits the community with having helped her grow her academic network, and encourages all members to participate in activities, to ask questions, and to get involved! We wish Erica amazing things for the future!


Giulia Porino | Being surrounded by scholars with similar research interests helped Giulia feel supported and understood, even on the days she was struggling. YSI always helped her find the motivation to come back to her research with a renewed sense of energy and determination, she explains. “Its a support network that I feel lucky to call my friends.” We feel lucky to have you, Giulia!


Giulia Zacchia | Giulia still remembers the nerves she felt ahead of the YSI Plenary in 2016 when she was tasked to represent the Gender and Economics Working Group. She was worried about the ability to attract young scholars and researchers interested in feminist economics within a YSI framework. But as soon as the meeting started, pride took over. The room was packed with scholars ready to discuss! It proved to her that nothing is impossible if you believe in your ideas. So true!


History of Economic Thought


Jérôme Lange | As a young scholar interested in the History of Economic Thought, Jérôme felt isolated and noticed that other scholars in the field did as well. He realized that they struggled to receive support from their home institutions to conduct research. This motivated him to get together with scholars in similar situations, and he became the first coordinator for the History of Economic Thought Working Group. We wish him well in all that’s to come!


Juan Acosta | The biggest piece of advice that outgoing coordinator Juan has for new YSI members is to get involved in organizing events for your working group. “It’s such an enriching experience, he says. “You’ll learn a lot while helping out other young scholars at the same time.” We’re grateful to Juan and all he’s done for YSI.


Inequality


Tahnee Ooms | Tahnee Ooms is proud to be part of a community that has been able to bring together scholars and mentors from all over the world to learn from each other. Her advice to the rest of the community is to meet as many scholars as possible and learn from the different perspectives YSI has to offer while identifying your own biases. Tahnee is now based at the London School of Economics. They’re lucky to have you, Tahnee!


Keynesian Economics


Guilherme Magacho | Guilherme Magacho’s favorite memory was being able to build bridges between distinct economic views and learning from people from different nationalities, with different backgrounds and perspectives. For Guilherme (and YSI!) this was a crucial way to develop new economic thinking. We’re excited to see how Guilherme will spread that approach in the rest of his career!


Rafael Ribeiro | Rafael is currently a professor at the Faculty of Economics at the Federal University of Minas Gerais in Brazil. His research interests are in growth theory, income distribution, fiscal and monetary dynamics, dynamical systems, and empirical modeling. We wish Rafael the best in his future endeavors!


Latin America


Julia Torracca | Julia feels grateful to be a part of a community that is made up of members from so many different backgrounds, hailing from all corners of the globe. In her time at YSI, it became clear that having a diverse community fosters stronger learning. We’re so excited for what she’ll do next!


Daniel Munevar | Daniel is a post-Keynesian economist who hails from Bogota, Colombia. He is the former advisor to Greek Finance Minister, Yanis Vorufakis, advising him on fiscal policy and debt sustainability. He is currently based at Uppsala University in Sweden and we wish him all the best!


Political Economy of Europe


Francesco Nicoli | Francesco encourages young scholars to use YSI as a way to facilitate joint research. For him, there is great value in having a community with which to exchange views and co-produce scientific work. Francesco is now based at the University of Ghent; we wish him only the best! 


Philosophy of Economics


Melissa Vergara Fernandez | For Melissa, there are too many favorite memories to just pick one. But all of them revolve around the people she met in YSI. “It’s a project with heart,” she says. Melissa is currently based at Erasmus University Rotterdam as a Postdoctoral Researcher. We wish her only the best!


Mads Vestergaard | For a lot of us, our time in YSI inspires the research we do. Mads was inspired to explore the ways in which ideology fuels economics, and how that may be criticized. Now that he is moving on from his time as a YSI coordinator, he is shifting his focus away from academia and towards art projects and philosophical writing– a truly multidisciplinary approach. We can’t wait to see what comes out!


States and Markets


Cecilia Rikap | Cecilia Rikap became a coordinator soon after completing her Ph.D., which coincided with a challenging time in her career to reformulate research questions. All the YSI events she participated in this time balanced the need to be a generalist and a specialist, which inspired her to reorient her research and focus on why she originally became an economist, which was to understand and transform capitalism. We know Cecilia can move mountains!


Urban and Regional Economics


Igor Tupy | Igor is currently an Associate Professor at the Federal University of Viçosa, UFV in Brazil. His interests are in Urban and Regional Economics and Post-Keynesian perspective with a focus on the regional impact of crises and the role of money and finance on regional economic resilience. We are so excited to see what Igor does next!


Jakob Sparn | “Seeing so many people coming together and sharing ideas in a very inclusive and caring way was truly inspiring and moving,” said Jakob of the YSI Latin America Regional Convening. If the outgoing coordinator could have one piece of advice for new members to the community, it’s to soak up as much as you can from your time at YSI. Good luck with all that’s to come, Jakob!


Renan Almeida | Renan was one of the founders of the Urban and Regional Economics working group and in his time as coordinator, he was involved in lots of YSI events around the world, ranging from Budapest, Sao Paulo, Edinburgh, and Los Angeles to Belo Horizonte, Buenos Aires, and Washington DC. He is currently a Professor of Economics at the UFSJ in Brazil. Thank you for all your hard work Renan!


Curious who the next cohort will be? Meet them here!

On  Shedding a Wall Street Ego

Rob Johnson, President of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, is not your average economist. He’s got heart and soul, or if you’ll have it, the blues! With his deep connection to the arts and humanities, Rob leads the new economic thinking not just with a sharp mind, but also with sensibility.

This article is part of an ongoing series in which Rob shares his life experiences, and biggest lessons learned. If you’re an aspiring expert in economics or a related field, this is for you. It might mitigate the depth and duration of your mid-life crisisEarlier articles in this series can be found here.


8 – On Shedding a Wall Street Ego

When I worked with Soros on the famous British pound evaluation, I lived in Greenwich, Connecticut. This was the time of Newt Gingrich, the Republican Speaker of the House at the time. And because I was a financier, everybody thought I loved Newt Gingrich. But I really didn’t! I kept thinking “these people all act like they know me, but they don’t know me at all.”

That discomfort was amplified by the fact that everyone wanted to do business deals all the time, wherever I’d go. I’d go to my son’s soccer games, and I’d just want to watch the match. But everyone would come up to me trying to talk business. Thankfully my neighbor was Diana Ross, the famous mo-town artist. She had two sons the same age as mine, who played soccer, too. So I’d go talk to her during the matches. Because with her being so famous, people would keep their distance. Next to her, I could hide, and just watch soccer.

But the discomfort lingered. You have to imagine what it was like being in this position. People were always wanting to meet me, to visit my home, to talk. They’d come from New Zealand and Australia and France, you name it. They always wanted to be around me. When I would walk out of the office, our nanny at home knew I was on the way because the minute I would shut down my office phone, everyone would start calling the house. There was all this activity, but it was weirdly lonely. I often went kayaking by myself just so no one could bug me.

Eventually, with the help of a life coach, I ended up deciding that I needed to make the hedge fund era a chapter in my life, not the book. But I knew that breaking out of it would mean a part of me would have to die. Not physically, of course. But I had to shed a personality.

At some point I was ready to do it. I broke away and began building my own sailboat, in a nearby town called Larchmont, NY. That was about a 13 mile bike ride; I called that my methadone clinic. By going up and down to Larchmont and working on the boat, I was getting rid of the addiction to Wall Street and was reconnecting with wanting to be a naval architect; reconnecting with old interests, old friends, and old passions.

I also volunteered in a nursing home, anonymously. I went in every day, and wiped people’s bottoms and set up beds and scooped ice cream and wore a green suit. Nobody including the directors had any idea who I was. There’s two things I got from the experience. One is that I saw people dying. While at the same time I was processing the death of a personality. So I had some really beautiful conversations taking care of these folks. The second thing is that instead of all this false adulation, I could go in there and if I fucked up something, these seniors would yell at me. “I don’t want vanilla ice cream, I want lemon sherbet!” And you try to serve them, comfort them, get them into a wheelchair, and there was one night we did a concert there. It helped me process the transition, and be reborn as something more authentic. Such change is not easy. But if you maintain faith in your ability to regenerate yourself, you can do it. And you can have a very satisfying life.

It may also have helped that during my youth in Detroit, I had some exposure to 1960s alternative culture hippies, along with Indian philosophy, meditation, Taoism, etc. Detroit was very tuned in to that, and the turmoil I saw there made me, too, search for a better philosophy. The stuff I looked for then, from the East, was about breaking with your ego; about breaking your clinging to things. That also means breaking with the sources of comfort that you seek when you’re afraid and anxious. You have to feel the fear and do it anyway. You have to realize that what you let yourself perceive, and what you do about it, are different things. You’re in control.

All that led me to a whole new chapter. I got back in touch with my interest in music. And I came to set up a record label…”


Read along with the story!

Carol Pearson
Awakening the Heroes Within


Read along with the story!

Pema Chödrön
When Things Fall Apart

Earlier articles in this series can be found here.

Subscribe to receive the next article directly to your inbox! And in the meantime, take a look at Rob’s podcast Economics and Beyond, available wherever you get your podcasts.

Is the New Chapter for the Monetary Policy Framework Too Old to Succeed?

Bagehot, “Money does not manage itself.”


By Elham Saeidinezhad – In this year’s Jackson Hole meeting, the Fed announced a formal shift away from previously articulated longer-run inflation objective of 2 percent towards achieving inflation that averages 2 percent over time. The new accord aims at addressing the shortfalls of the low “natural rate” and persistently low inflation. More or less, all academic debates in that meeting were organized as arguments about the appropriate quantitative settings for a Taylor rule. The rule’s underlying idea is that the market tends to set the nominal interest rate equal to the natural rate plus expected inflation. The Fed’s role is to stabilize the long-run inflation by changing the short-term federal funds rate whenever the inflation deviates from the target. The Fed believes that the recent secular decline in natural rates relative to the historical average has constrained the federal funds rate. The expectation is that the Fed’s decision to tolerate a temporary overshooting of the longer-run inflation to keep inflation and inflation expectations centered on 2 percent following periods when inflation has been persistently below 2 percent will address the framework’s constant failure and restore the magic of central banking. However, the enduring problem with the Taylor rule-based monetary policy frameworks, including the recent one, is that they want the Fed to overlook the lasting trends in the credit market, and only focus on the developments in the real economy, such as inflation or past inflation deviations, when setting the short-term interest rates. Rectifying such blind spots is what money view scholars were hoping for when the Fed announced its intention to review the monetary policy framework.

The logic behind the new framework, known as average inflation targeting strategy, is that inflation undershooting makes achieving the target unlikely in the future as it pushes the inflation expectations below the target. This being the case, when there is a long period of inflation undershooting the target, the Fed should act to undo the undershooting by overshooting the target for some time. The Fed sold forecast (or average) targeting to the public as a better way of accomplishing its mandate compared to the alternative strategies as the new framework makes the Fed more “history-dependent.” Translated into the money view language, however, the new inflation-targeting approach only delays the process of imposing excessive discipline in the money market when the consumer price index rises faster than the inflation target and providing excessive elasticity when prices are growing slower than the inflation target.

From the money view perspective, the idea that the interest rate should not consider private credit market trends will undermine central banking’s power in the future, as it has done in the past. The problem we face is not that the Fed failed to follow an appropriate version of Taylor rule. Rather, and most critically, these policies tend to abstract from the plumbing behind the wall, namely the payment system, by disregarding the credit market. Such a bias may have not been significant in the old days when the payment system was mostly a reserve-based system. In the old world, even though it was mostly involuntarily, the Fed used to manage the payment system through its daily interventions in the market for reserves. In the modern financial system, however, the payment system is a credit system, and its quality depends on the level of elasticity and discipline in the private credit market.

The long dominance of economics and finance views imply that modern policymakers have lost sight of the Fed’s historical mission to manage the balance between discipline and elasticity in the payment system. Instead of monitoring the balance between discipline and elasticity in the credit market, the modern Fed attempts to keep the bank rate of interest in line with an ideal “natural rate” of interest, introduced by Knut Wicksell. In Wicksellians’ world, in contrast to the money view, securing the continuous flow of credit in the economy through the payment system is not part of the Fed’s mandate. Instead, the Fed’s primary function is to ensure it does not choose a “money rate” of interest different from the “natural rate” of interest (profit rate capital). If lower, then the differential creates an incentive for new capital investment, and the new spending tends to cause inflation. If prices are rising, then the money rate is too low and should be increased; if prices are falling, then the money rate is too high and should be decreased. To sum up, Wicksellians do not consider private credit to be intrinsically unstable. Inflation, on the other hand, is viewed as the source of inherent instability. Further, they see no systemic relation between the payment system and the credit market as the payment system simply reflects the level of transactions in the real economy.

The clash between the standard economic view and money view is a battle between two different world views. Wicksell’s academic way of looking at the world had clear implications for monetary policy: set the money rate equal to the natural rate and then stand back and let markets work. Unfortunately, the natural rate is not observable, but the missed payments and higher costs of borrowing are. In the money view perspective, the Fed should use its alchemy to strike a balance between elasticity and discipline in the credit market to ensure a continuous payment system. The money view barometer to understand the credit market cycle is asset prices, another observable variable. Since the crash can occur in commodities, financial assets, and even real assets, the money view does not tell us which assets to watch. However, it emphasizes that the assets that are not supported by a dealer system (such as residential housing) are more vulnerable to changes in credit conditions. These assets are most likely to become overvalued on the upside and suffer the most extensive correction on the downside. A central bank that understands its role as setting interest rates to meet inflation targets tends to exacerbate this natural tendency toward instability. These policymakers could create unnaturally excessive discipline when credit condition is already tight or vice versa while looking for a natural rate of interest.

Elham Saeidinezhad is Term Assistant Professor of Economics  at Barnard College, Columbia University. Previously, Elham taught at UCLA, and served as a research economist in International Finance and Macroeconomics research group at Milken Institute, Santa Monica, where she investigated the post-crisis structural changes in the capital market as a result of macroprudential regulations. Before that, she was a postdoctoral fellow at INET, working closely with Prof. Perry Mehrling and studying his “Money View”.  Elham obtained her Ph.D. from the University of Sheffield, UK, in empirical Macroeconomics in 2013. You may contact Elham via the Young Scholars Directory

On Doing Structural Analysis Before the Internet 

Rob Johnson, President of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, is not your average economist. He’s got heart and soul, or if you’ll have it, the blues! With his deep connection to the arts and humanities, Rob leads the new economic thinking not just with a sharp mind, but also with sensibility.

This article is part of an ongoing series in which Rob shares his life experiences, and biggest lessons learned. If you’re an aspiring expert in economics or a related field, this is for you. It might mitigate the depth and duration of your mid-life crisisEarlier articles in this series can be found here.


7 – On Doing Structural Analysis Before the Internet 

My time as a trader taught me a few important lessons.   

One, economics can show you where the questions and opportunities are. But, two, you got to get on an airplane and go see it with the whites of your eyes, because it’s about timing. If you short the Spanish peseta and you’re three months early, then you’re paying twenty-four percent interest and earning five; you’ll lose a lot! You have to be mindful of timing, and in those days, that meant being close to things.   

Back then, there were very few people who did real, structural analysis, especially of the intra-Asian economy. So, when I was working on that region, we looked at the commodity composition of the economies; the exports and imports of each of the Asian countries, and the geographic composition of who their trading partners were. So, if, say, the Japanese economy is going up and the U.S. is decelerating, you could see that one country would be affected more negatively than another. Or when the terms of trade would change in a particular sector, you could tell who would get hurt or benefit.  

During my time at Bankers Trust, I met a guy named Rodney Jones, who understood this well. He was based in Malaysia, and I had taken a position against the Malaysian ringgit. When we first got talking, he was at an equity firm.  He asked me “are you actually interested in this macro stuff?” And I said, yes, let’s talk. So over cocktails, Rodney told me that what he does is he gets on an airplane every month and he goes around twelve different countries, collects all the data on budgets and central bank reserves, and builds his own structural database! I hired him, first to Bankers Trust and then I brought him with me to Soros. He now runs a major consulting firm based out of Beijing. He’s brilliant.   

In the end, speculation is about knowing what the world thinks, seeing something that’s different, and then: timing. You have to know when the world will come around and see what you’re seeing; you have to know what the catalyst for that will be.   

When I was in this business, with Rodney and others, we knew that the insights we produced with our own models were not yet reflected in the prices. And a significant part of it was about being well-connected and having access to the information. I used to have a foreign exchange dealer I relied on in New Zealand because they’d open on Sunday morning. I could call them and find out what everyone is lining up to do that week. They’d have their finger on the pulse.   

At times, it almost felt like taking candy from a baby. Because you could just see it. You could work with a handful of people very quietly, and figure out the insights you needed to make a profitable trade. But the times did change, and the world did catch up. 

Already when ERM blew up, Reuters came to focus on that, which made me lose my edge in Europe a bit. So that’s what made me think, let me go into Asia, and build that out. That was great. But then the Asian crisis rolled around, and with that, I lost my edge there, too. At that point, I’d joke, saying, “I try to go where other people don’t understand what’s going on. I guess I wish they had asset prices on Mars because it seems like Earth was running out of places.”  

Now, things are different. You can set up spreadsheets in Bloomberg, and when you wake up in the morning, there’s all this new data, updated for you, and the communication flows go everywhere. In my days, we had a fax machine. It was more about fieldwork. 

And for me, personally, I never really thought of myself as an investor. I was focused on deepening my understanding of planet earth. But all of a sudden, people did put me on first-class airplanes,  bought me electronic machines, and wanted to make deals left and right. I was meeting everybody all over the world.   

It was a hell of a learning platform. But at some point, it was exhausting, and stressful for my family. So, ultimately,  I chose to make the hedge-fund industry a chapter of my life, not the book…  


Earlier articles in this series can be found here.

Subscribe to receive the next article directly to your inbox! And in the meantime, take a look at Rob’s podcast Economics and Beyond, available wherever you get your podcasts.

On Working with George Soros, and Breaking the British Pound

Rob Johnson, President of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, is not your average economist. He’s got heart and soul, or if you’ll have it, the blues! With his deep connection to the arts and humanities, Rob leads the new economic thinking not just with a sharp mind, but also with sensibility.

This article is part of an ongoing series in which Rob shares his life experiences, and biggest lessons learned. If you’re an aspiring expert in economics or a related field, this is for you. It might mitigate the depth and duration of your mid-life crisisEarlier articles in this series can be found here.


6 – On Working with George Soros, and Breaking the British Pound

As I began working with the Soros equity team in 1992, I was watching the British economy. They had floating rate mortgages, a highly leveraged economy, and lots of people with exposure to the stock market. You could see that if the Germans wouldn’t cut rates, then Britain would be in trouble. They’d either have to devalue or raise rates. With an election coming up, they were in a tough spot.   

As they got under more stress, Britain’s Prime Minister, John Major, tried to restore confidence. He said the British pound would remain the reserve currency of Europe for the foreseeable future. That was like putting a red flag in front of a German bull. We had a consultant friend, David Smith, who was very well-connected in Germany, who knew from the German central bank that they’d never cut rates to let the UK out of turmoil. So, we had our hypothesis for the ERM, and the British pound.  

Because I was leaving Bankers Trust to Soros in the midst of this, I tried to help Bankers Trust understand the same strategy; I felt some responsibility to them.  

Things progressed quickly. When Italy devalued, the Germans cut interest rates a quarter-point. And they told our contact, David Smick, that they won’t cut anymore. Not for the British, or anyone else.   

At this point, we did not yet have a very big position on.  So George and Stan and I had a meeting, and George said, “how big a position do you think you ought to take?” Stan asked me “What do you think you make on the downside?” I said, “well, 18 to 20 percent if there’s a devaluation.”  

And how much would we lose? “Well, I said, we’d stay within the band. So you might lose one and a quarter percent, but it would be very liquid if they hold the system together.”  

Now it became very clear. They asked me, “so you mean that’s like 18 or 20 to one shot!? This is the bet of a lifetime!”  

George asked me how much leverage I would have used on this at Bankers Trust. I said three to five times capital. Then George just said, “okay, guys, let’s start at least three times capital.”   

At that point, that was 15 billion dollars. And Britain only had around twenty-two billion in reserves.  

That’s what led to Black Wednesday. Britain ended up having to withdraw the British pound from the ERM, after the British pound had long been the store of value. There was a sense of embarrassment for Britain, absolutely. But after they devalued the economy, they started recovering, and interest rates came down. So, some actually call it White Wednesday.   

After this major trade, it was off to the races. I focused more on other places. I built up a four billion dollar position short the Swedish kroner. And that dropped almost 55 percent. Not 15 or 18 percent, but 55! That was another very profitable trade.   

George was an incredible coach throughout all this. He was not directly involved, it was Stanley who was in charge, and I was the deputy, but George would act as a coach; he wanted you to learn, and it showed in the way he interacted.  

In 1993, when I was working on Spanish bonds, he called me into his office and said “I don’t like what you’re doing.” I explained myself, and he said, “well, I gave you the keys to run these positions. You should stick to your guns and we’ll find out what happens.” That time, I was right, and I made a lot of money. So, George walked into my office and he said, “Way to go. You were right!” But in another instance, I lost money. It went wrong, and I went to his office, admitting my mistake. All he said was “well, what did you learn?” No scolding, whatsoever. That’s so great about George.  

He was, and still is, a big presence, but not an intimidating one. He was always trying to bring our creativity out; he was not making us into subordinates. He was focused on us performing well; on his team making money.  

Stanley, too, was incredible to work with. For his birthday, I once gave him a photograph of Coltrane and Miles Davis playing together. Because I so relished the pleasure of the teamwork with him. We did a lot together; and he taught me so much. His expertise in bonds, and in equities; I got to learn from him through example and conversation.   


Read along with the story!

Sebastian Mallaby’s book More money than god  tells the story of the British Pound in great detail, drawing from extensive interviews with Rob.


Earlier articles in this series can be found here.

Subscribe to receive the next article directly to your inbox! And in the mean time, take a look at Rob’s podcast Economics and Beyond, available wherever you get your podcasts.

Is Monetary Policy Divorcing from Money Market and Uniting with Capital Market?

“The pronouncements and actions of the Federal Reserve Board on monetary policy are a charade.” Fischer Black


By Elham Saeidinezhad – As the US Department of Treasury builds the points along the yield curve, the bank reserves are losing relevance in explaining short-term money market rates’ behavior. Central banks assume that they can create a close link between the best form of money (reserve) and monetary policy. They use the supply of reserves precisely to achieve the target interest rate. Since the 2008-09 Great Financial Crisis (GFC), however, the relationship between money and monetary policy has become unstable. After the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, the Fed’s actions more than doubled the supply of bank reserves, from approximately $1.5 trillion in March to more than $3 trillion in June. In theory, such a massive increase in the supply of reserves should reduce the money market rates. Yet, short-term money market rates have been surprisingly steady, despite the enormous increase in reserves during the great lockdown. Fed economists recognize the over-supply of short-term US Treasury bills (a money market instrument) as the leading cause of the puzzling behavior in money market rates and call it “friction.” 

However, for the Money View scholars, dividing the money market from the capital market, assuming that prices in each market are solely determined by its supply and demand flow, has never been an effective way of understanding interest rates. In the Money View world, similar to Fischer Black’s CAPM, the arbitrage condition implies that both the quantity and the price of money are ultimately determined by private dealers borrowing and lending activities that connect different markets rather than the stance of monetary policy alone. Dealers engage in “yield spread arbitrage,” in which they identify apparent mispricing (i.e., temporary fluctuations in supply or demand) at one segment of the yield curve, and takes a position. Dealers take “positions,” which means they speculate on how prices of assets with similar risk structure but different term-to-maturity, will change. In the meantime, they hedge interest rate exposures by taking an opposite position at another segment of the yield curve.

The point to emphasize is that short-term money markets and long-term capital markets are, in fact, not separate. As a result, prices in each market are not solely determined by the flow of supply and demand in that particular market. By taking advantage of the arbitrage opportunity, the dealers act as “porters” of liquidity from one market to another and connect prices in different markets in the process. The instruments that allow the dealers to transfer liquidity and solidify markets are repos and reverse repos, where capital market assets are used as collaterals to borrow from the money market, or vice versa. The Money View’s strength in understanding price dynamics comes from its ability, and willingness, to understand the dealers whose business connects different points of the yield curve and determines the effectiveness of the monetary policy.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, two separate but equally essential developments (aka distortions) occurred along the yield curve. In the long-term capital market, the Treasury has introduced a new class of safe assets, a 20-year Treasury bond, with a high yield (corresponding to the lowest accepted bid price) of 1.22 percent. Effectively, the US Treasury added a new point to the long-term end of the yield curve. In the short-term money market, the Fed injected a massive amount of reserves to reduce money market rates. The standard view suggests that such an increase in the supply of reserves would reduce the money market rates. The idea is that banks are the only institutions that hold these extra reserves. Due to balance sheet constraints, such as banks’ regulatory requirements, higher reserve holding implies higher banks’ costs. Therefore, banks reduce their short-term rates to signal their willingness to lend. In practice, however, short-term rates remained unchanged.

This dynamic in money market rates can be explained by the recent developments in the Treasury market, a segment of the capital market, and actions of the dealers who took advantage of the consequent arbitrage opportunity along the yield curve, i.e., the high spread between the short-term money market and the long-term risk-free Treasury rates. The dealers increased demand in the short-term money market both for hedging, and financing the newly issued Treasury bonds, put upward pressure on short-term rates. In contrast, the Fed’s activities put downward pressure on these rates. Observe that an increase in private demand for short-term funding (due to yield spread arbitrage) and an increase in the supply of reserves by the Fed (due to monetary policy) have opposing effects on short-term rates. Thus, it should not be surprising that despite the excessive reserve supply after the pandemic, the money market rates have remained stable. Understanding this kind of arbitrage along the yield curve is essential in understanding the behavior of short-term rates and the monetary policy’s effectiveness.

What is missing in this literature, but emphasized in the Money View framework, is acknowledging the hybridity between the money market and the capital market. The close link between the US Treasury market and the money market is a feature of the shadow banking or the new market-based finance. It is no friction. More importantly, the dealers’ search for “arbitrage” opportunities implies that individual securities markets are not separate. Speculators are joining the different markets into a single market. In doing so, they bring about a result that is no part of their intention, namely liquidity. As the Treasury creates an additional risk-free, liquid, point along the yield curve, it creates more arbitrage opportunities. Such developments make the yield curve an even more critical tool of examining the monetary policy effects. In the meantime, the traditional framework of supply and demand for bank reserves to control the short-term money market rate is losing its pertinence.

Elham Saeidinezhad is Term Assistant Professor of Economics  at Barnard College, Columbia University. Previously, Elham taught at UCLA, and served as a research economist in International Finance and Macroeconomics research group at Milken Institute, Santa Monica, where she investigated the post-crisis structural changes in the capital market as a result of macroprudential regulations. Before that, she was a postdoctoral fellow at INET, working closely with Prof. Perry Mehrling and studying his “Money View”.  Elham obtained her Ph.D. from the University of Sheffield, UK, in empirical Macroeconomics in 2013. You may contact Elham via the Young Scholars Directory

On Becoming Mickey Mantle

Rob Johnson, President of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, is not your average economist. He’s got heart and soul, or if you’ll have it, the blues! With his deep connection to the arts and humanities, Rob leads the new economic thinking not just with a sharp mind, but also with sensibility.

This article is part of an ongoing series in which Rob shares his life experiences, and biggest lessons learned. If you’re an aspiring expert in economics or a related field, this is for you. It might mitigate the depth and duration of your mid-life crisisEarlier articles in this series can be found here.


5 – On becoming mickey mantle

“When I got to know Soros in the late 1980s, he introduced me to this guy he’d hired: Stanley Druckenmiller. Stan was an absolute genius. In those days —before LeBron James—I’d call him the Michael Jordan of traders. The three of us came to have frequent discussions about the state of the world and strategy. There clearly was a strong connection between Soros and I; a kind of a strategic side and an intuitive side, which I was very in sync with him about. Largely because the work of Charles Kindleberger (who had inspired me to become an economist) resonates with Soros’ approaches.  

And it seemed that Stanley and I could be a very good team. Stanley was a much better trader than I, but I could augment him as a kind of sounding board, and be a constructive critic on strategy. I think Soros believed in teams as a way to diminish error; if you have two bright people who trust each other working together, you’ll know that when both of them give the green light on something, the likelihood of success is pretty good.   

So at one point, they offered me a job with them. But I wasn’t so sure. I didn’t think I was ready. I looked at them and I used a baseball analogy: I said “you’re Babe Ruth and you’re Lou Gehrig but I’m not yet Mickey Mantle!” I knew that if I joined, there may not be that much time to learn the ropes; the firm had a reputation for hiring people quickly. And if someone didn’t work out, they’d just throw them back out. So, I wanted to strengthen myself first. But when I said that, Soros looked at me and he said, “well, Robert, if you want to stay in the womb and not be born, that’s your problem.” He was tough love.  

So, I kept working at Bankers Trust. At this time, I was trying to build a long, short fund in Asia. My clients were like the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, and others who had reserve management in the Asian countries. The Asian system was not as formal as the ERM, and I learned how to play with it. And they could learn by watching me; I agreed I’d report my positions to them every week.   

Then, the following spring, in 1992, they had what was called the Maastricht Vote, and the Danish voted against affirming the Maastricht Treaty. Everybody’s position, including ours, had been really long the periphery, and short the core. And Germany was going through unification and unification required a very big fiscal stimulus. I actually understood the situation fundamental textbook macroeconomics. You have a nominal exchange rate that’s locked or within a narrow band. And you have in Germany a stimulus, in the real sector, from the fiscal rebuilding of East Germany. That puts pressure on the system, so have to allow the real exchange rate to appreciate. 

At that point, you can do one of three things:  1) You can break the German Mark out and let it rise,  2) You can let Germany inflate, which was undesirable in their minds after the hyperinflation in the 1920s, 3) You can deflate everybody else. So, we started to watch the situation. Everybody had all these positions; not just speculative funds. Lots of corporations were funding themselves in Deutschmarks at eight percent rather than at Swedish kroner at 12 percent. They were saving on what you call “the carry.” The pressure in the system was going to build up. Then, in May, the French announced that they were going to hold a vote in September. That was my cue to schedule a dinner with Stanley Druckenmiller.   

Stan and I got together at an Italian restaurant on the East Side. We talked through the strategy together and at one point I said “I think I’m Mickey Mantle now; I think it’s time I come work with you guys.” So Stan and I talked for a while. And then, that same night, he talked to George, and they made me an offer that I accepted…”

Earlier articles in this series can be found here.


Subscribe to receive the next article directly to your inbox! And in the mean time, take a look at Rob’s podcast Economics and Beyond, available wherever you get your podcasts.